Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/1099Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Pratibha SD, Vidya Patil, Basvaraj Patil, Vijaya Sorganvi. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-05T10:45:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-11-05T10:45:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 23944781 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1099 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Supraglottic airway devices are safe and efficient in airway management. I-gelTM and ProsealTM laryngeal mask airway are supraglottic airway devices which are used to secure and maintain airway during anaesthesia with additional gastric channel. Aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of both the supraglottic airway devices, I-gel and Proseal LMA(PLMA) in patients under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | BLDE(Deemed to be University) | en_US |
| dc.subject | I-gel airway, Proseal LMA, Controlled ventilation, Supraglottic airway device, Hemodynamics | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of two supraglottic airways - I-gel and Proseal laryngeal mask airway for ease of insertion and hemodynamic stability. | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Anesthesiology | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.