Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/1353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKatyayani Palur, Surekha U Arakeri.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-24T06:14:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-24T06:14:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1353-
dc.description.abstractThe International Consensus Group for Hematology Review (ICGHR) are essentially review criteria designed to reduce the number of manual smear reviews following analysis in automated hematology analyzers (AHAs). Although AHAs are an indispensable part of the present‑day clinical laboratory, manual smear reviews still play an integral role in identifying morphological abnormalities and to confirm the results of the analyzers. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the ICGHR criteria and our laboratory criteria using the Sysmex XN‑1000 for manual peripheral smear reviewen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLDE(Deemed to be University)en_US
dc.subjectAutomated hematology analyzers, International Consensus Group for Hematology Review criteria (ICGHR), manual peripheral smear reviewen_US
dc.title"Effectiveness of the International Consensus Group criteria for manual peripheral smear review."en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Pathology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A1263.pdf709.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.