Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/1499Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Aparna Y Takpare, Vinod V Kamble, Rajani Yadav, Prashanth K Parandekar, Sanyay Wavare. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-13T10:14:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-12-13T10:14:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1499 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of Rapid screening methods like Quantitative Buffy Coat (QBC) and Antigen detection assay- pLDH (plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase) and HRP2 (Histidine rich protein 2) as compared to Peripheral smear examination in the rapid diagnosis of malaria. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | BLDE(Deemed to be University) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Quantitative buffy coat (QBC), Peripheral smear, pLDH (plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase), HRP 2 (Histidine rich protein 2), malarial parasite | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparative study of three different methods for the reapid diagnosis of plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax malaria. | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Microbiology | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.