Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/1766
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Arakeri S, Shivakumarswamy U Karigoudar M Yelikar B | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-20T10:44:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-20T10:44:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1766 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The cytological examinations of serous effusions have been well-accepted, and a positive diagnosis is often considered as a definitive diagnosis. It helps in staging, prognosis and management of the patients in malignancies and also gives information about various inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Diagnostic problems arise in everyday practice to differentiate reactive atypical mesothelial cells and malignant cells by the routine conventional smear (CS) method. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BLDE(Deemed to be University) | en_US |
dc.subject | Cell block; conventional smear; pleural effusions; sensitivity. | en_US |
dc.title | Diagnostic utility of cell block method versus the conventional smear study in pleural fliud cytology. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Pathology |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.