| dc.contributor.author | Arakeri S, Shivakumarswamy U Karigoudar M Yelikar B | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-20T10:44:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-01-20T10:44:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-06-03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1766 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The cytological examinations of serous effusions have been well-accepted, and a positive diagnosis is often considered as a definitive diagnosis. It helps in staging, prognosis and management of the patients in malignancies and also gives information about various inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Diagnostic problems arise in everyday practice to differentiate reactive atypical mesothelial cells and malignant cells by the routine conventional smear (CS) method. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | BLDE(Deemed to be University) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cell block; conventional smear; pleural effusions; sensitivity. | en_US |
| dc.title | Diagnostic utility of cell block method versus the conventional smear study in pleural fliud cytology. | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |