DSpace Repository

Comparision of modified aldrete score versus fast track criteria for evaluating postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dr.Shravy Emmanni
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-09T09:16:34Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-09T09:16:34Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4576
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT BACKGROUND With the advent of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgeries, more patients with comorbidities are accepted for surgery. Early recovery after surgery is marked by regular and spontaneous respiration, awake patient, haemodynamic stability, appropriate oxygen saturation and adequate motor activity, patient is moved to a step down unit for Phase II recovery where he/she is followed up and readied to go home [1]. Modified Aldrete score and fast-track criteria [2-5] are the two commonly used scoring systems to assess recovery from general anaesthesia. With increasing number of laparoscopic surgeries where patients are discharged early, a recovery assessment tool with inbuilt assessment of the pain and nausea was deemed necessary so that health care providers are fairly confident in their decision to discharge a patient safely. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BLDE(Deemed to be University) en_US
dc.subject Comparision of modified aldrete score versus fast track criteria for evaluating postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery en_US
dc.title Comparision of modified aldrete score versus fast track criteria for evaluating postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics