DSpace Repository

comparative study between tapp and open hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repair

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dr. Chandana G
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-10T03:05:00Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-10T03:05:00Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4586
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT Background: Inguinal hernia repair has evolved over the last few decades, and more research is still being conducted in this area. Laparoscopy has gained widespread acceptance in today's surgical world, but the most scientific way to determine the superiority of one method over another is through evidence-based medicine. Aims and objectives: To investigate the difference in postoperative stay, intensity of postoperative pain, and complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound infection, neuralgia, numbness, and scrotal swelling between the two techniques. Methods: From October 2019 to June 2021, a prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital to compare Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair and Lichtenstein's open mesh repair. The study included 60 subjects with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernias divided into two groups of 30 patients each. The outcomes and variables were evaluated. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BLDE(Deemed to be University) en_US
dc.subject comparative study between tapp and open hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repair en_US
dc.title comparative study between tapp and open hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repair en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics