Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/4275
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorN, Nithyashree-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-13T06:58:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-13T06:58:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4275-
dc.description.abstractSpinal anesthesia is the most commonly used technique for lower abdominal surgeries as it is very economical and easy to administer 1. The advantages of subarachnoid block are limited by its short duration of action and lack of postoperative analgesia. In recent years, the supplementation of local anaesthetics with adjuvants is widely in practice, to reduce the dose of local anaesthetic, minimize side effects and prolong the duration of anaesthesia 1,2 . Opioid added to local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia was first introduced into clinical practice in 1979 with intrathecal morphine as a forerunner. Neuraxial administration of opioids along with local anaesthetics improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia and also provide postoperative pain relief for longer duration3,4. Intrathecal morphine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia but is associated with increased risk of nausea, vomiting, itching and respiratory depression5. Fentanyl,en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLDE(Deemed to be University)en_US
dc.subjectIntrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectBuprenorphineen_US
dc.subjectLower Abdominal Surgeriesen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% with Fentanyl versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% with Buprenorphine In Lower Limb and Lower Abdominal Surgeries.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Anaesthesialogy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NITHYASHREE N-ANAESTHESIOLOGY-2020.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.