Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/4586
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. Chandana G-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-10T03:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-10T03:05:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4586-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background: Inguinal hernia repair has evolved over the last few decades, and more research is still being conducted in this area. Laparoscopy has gained widespread acceptance in today's surgical world, but the most scientific way to determine the superiority of one method over another is through evidence-based medicine. Aims and objectives: To investigate the difference in postoperative stay, intensity of postoperative pain, and complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound infection, neuralgia, numbness, and scrotal swelling between the two techniques. Methods: From October 2019 to June 2021, a prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital to compare Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair and Lichtenstein's open mesh repair. The study included 60 subjects with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernias divided into two groups of 30 patients each. The outcomes and variables were evaluated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLDE(Deemed to be University)en_US
dc.subjectcomparative study between tapp and open hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repairen_US
dc.titlecomparative study between tapp and open hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repairen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Department of General Surgery

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dr chandana G_merged Surgery .pdf3.84 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.