Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6468
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRahul Shenoy A-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-28T15:13:17Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-28T15:13:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21277919-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6468-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Complex intra-articular fractures of the proximal tibia (Schatzker types V and VI) present significant challenges in orthopaedic trauma management. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has emerged as a potential tool to enhance preoperative planning and surgical execution for these complex fractures. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of proximal tibial Schatzker type V and VI fractures treated with or without the aid of 3D-printed models. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted with 40 patients presenting with Schatzker type V and VI proximal tibial fractures, divided equally into a 3D print group (n=20) and a conventional treatment control group (n=20). Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and surgical parameters including operating time, blood loss, fluoroscopy exposure, and number of implant trials were recorded and analysed. Results: Both groups had comparable demographic and fracture characteristics. The 3D print group demonstrated significantly shorter mean surgical time (110.2±19.3 vs. 142.5±34.04 minutes; p=0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (275±109.4 vs. 370±155.1 ml; p=0.03), and decreased fluoroscopy exposure (0.22±0.15 vs. 0.34±0.06 mSv; p=0.002) compared to the control group. Most notably, 70% of cases in the 3D print group required zero implant trials compared to only 10% in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of 3D-printed models for preoperative planning in Schatzker type V and VI proximal tibial fractures significantly improves surgical efficiency by reducing operating time, blood loss, radiation exposure, and implant trials. These findings suggest that 3D printing technology represents a valuable adjunct in the management of complex proximal tibial fractures, potentially improving both the process and outcomes of surgical management for these challenging injuries.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLDE (Deemed to be University)en_US
dc.subjectProximal tibia fracture; Schatzker classification; 3D printing; Preoperative planning; Surgical outcomes; Intra-articular fractures; Orthopaedic traumaen_US
dc.titleStudy of proximal tibia intraarticular fracures schatzker type 5 and 6 treated with or without 3d printing model” – a comparative studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Orthopedics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22BMORT08.pdf10.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.