Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://20.193.157.4:9595/xmlui/handle/123456789/4572
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. Sankalpa Saha-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T08:58:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-09T08:58:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4572-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT A STUDY TO TEST THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PRE PROCEDURE ULTRASOUND GUIDED PARAMEDIAN TECHNIQUE AS COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL LANDMARK GUIDED PARAMEDIAN TECHNIQUE IN ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA Background and Aims: Regional anaesthesia is a very widely used safe anaesthetic technique for elective as well emergency surgeries. It is given through different approaches, namely: 1. Midline; 2. Paramedian; 3. Taylor. Also it is practiced through the conventional landmark guided approach or the more modern ultrasound approach. In the quest for a more efficacious way of practising spinal anaesthesia , here we compare both the conventional and USG guided methods and see for ourselves how the two hold up against each other through various parameters.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLDE(Deemed to be University)en_US
dc.subjectA study to test the efficacy and safety of pre procedure ultrasound guided paramedian technique as compared to conventional landmark guided paramedian technique in administering spinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleA study to test the efficacy and safety of pre procedure ultrasound guided paramedian technique as compared to conventional landmark guided paramedian technique in administering spinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Anaesthesialogy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dr Sankalpa Saha Anesthesia .pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.